🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the New York major last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three players in the world back-to-back. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class delivery and concussive power on both forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is often helpless. The past few seasons has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged up to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of American men winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the point of frustration. When he finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a terrible game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Facing match points in the last game, his first serve sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly appeared like he believed he could win. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he felt decided a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it forever if I fail to do it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {